Judgements during information seeking: a naturalistic approach to understanding the assessment of enough information

نویسنده

  • Jennifer M. Berryman
چکیده

In this article, theories of human judgement and decision making are reviewed and their use by library and information science researchers examined. A different perspective on judgement and decision making is offered by the field of naturalistic decision making (NDM) and the implications of this approach are considered for an expanded understanding of how judgements and decisions are made during information seeking. This discussion is illustrated by a case from a recent empirical investigation into how judgements of enough information are made in the workplace. The article concludes with a critical evaluation of the NDM approach. It is argued that NDM, a recent development in decision theory, offers a new perspective from which to investigate judgements and decisions during information seeking.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

What defines 'enough' information? How policy workers make judgements and decisions during information seeking: preliminary results from an exploratory study

Introduction. Reports findings from research in progress investigating judgment and decision making during information seeking in the workplace, in particular, the assessment of enough information. Characteristics of this judgment and the role of context in shaping it are framed against theories of human judgment and decision making. Method. Thirty-three semi-structured interviews were conducte...

متن کامل

Health Information-Seeking Behavior of Pregnant Women: A Grounded Theory Study

Background and Aim: In studies of special groups’ information seeking behavior, there is not a complete understanding of pregnant women's information seeking process. The purpose is to gain a deeper understanding of health information seeking behavior of the pregnant women. Method: This is an applied qualitative method using Grounded Theory approach. Data were collected through semi- structured...

متن کامل

Rereading the Bystrom and Jarvelin's Information Seeking Behavior Model: Can the Scope of this Model Be Criticized?

Background and aim: Information seeking behaviors are the reflection of users' needs that Identifying and understanding them correctly is imperative in information seeking endeavors. Experts have presented cognitive and Process user-oriented approach models to better understand scholars’ information seeking behaviors.  The intent of models are to define and clarify the conditions that predict p...

متن کامل

The effect of trust on collaborative information seeking behavior of postgraduate students of Shiraz University

 Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify the impact of trust on collaborative information seeking behaviors of postgraduate students of Shiraz University. Methodology: A quantitive approach was applied and survey method was used to analyze the the impact of trust on collaborative information seeking behaviors. The statistical population included all graduate students of Shiraz Unive...

متن کامل

Relevance as process: judgements in the context of scholarly research

Introduction. This paper discusses how exploring the research process indepth and over time contributes to a fuller understanding of interactions with various representations of information. Method. A longitudinal ethnographic study explored decisions made by two informants involved in scholarly research. Relevance assessment and information seeking were observed as part of informants' own ongo...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • J. Information Science

دوره 34  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008